Questions
Frequently asked questions
Whose fault is the billing gap?
This is not a question of fault. Students are teenagers; consistent tap behavior is hard to enforce, especially on buses where rear-door boarding is common. Missed taps are a practical reality of running the transit system. But the financial consequences are real — SEPTA is under severe fiscal pressure, and an $11 million annual subsidy that was never agreed to and isn't reflected in any contract is unsustainable.
Why are 31,600 students excluded from the program right now?
Current rules require students in grades 7–12 to live 1.5 miles or more from their school to qualify for a free fare card. Students who live closer are excluded entirely, regardless of whether walking or another mode is actually safe or practical for them.
Why not go as far as Seattle, where transit is free for all youth?
Washington State's Move Ahead Washington package allows youth 18 and under to ride free with no time restrictions, no distance thresholds, and no school-day limitations. Philadelphia does not need to go as far as Seattle to make a meaningful difference — but it should not be falling behind cities that have already solved the problem we're still debating.
How would this be paid for?
Replacing tap-based billing with a flat annual payment doesn't require new money — it fixes a structural gap in how SEPTA is compensated for service it's already providing. Expanding eligibility to all grades 7–12 students does require new city funding. Options under discussion include a rideshare fee, the Transportation Access Fund, and general fund appropriation.
Is this just about getting to and from school?
No. The current pass is valid 5:30 AM–8:00 PM on school days only — no weekends, no summer. That covers commuting but fails at nearly everything else a teenager might need transit for: after-school jobs, weekend sports, summer programs, or just getting around the city.